🧪 Add test for generic error handler (500)#9
Conversation
Co-authored-by: shenald-dev <245350826+shenald-dev@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: The generic error handler (catching unexpected 500 errors) was lacking test coverage.
📊 Coverage: A new test case has been added to
tests/api.test.jsto simulate an internal server error by mockingcrypto.randomUUID(). This ensures the API returns a proper500 Internal server errorJSON response and prevents stack traces from leaking to the client.✨ Result: Increased test coverage and improved reliability by guaranteeing that unexpected server failures are handled gracefully without exposing sensitive internal details.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6300726740253245530 started by @shenald-dev